Today is

Saturday, October 28, 2006

Smear Attempt On Former Janesville Cop

Earlier this year, James Martin, a police officer with the Janesville Department was involved in a traffic accident while off-duty and did not report it for 22 hours. After an investigation by the department, officials eventually accused the officer of drunken driving and lying to investigators. In poor judgment, this officer made a series of bad moves with investigators in what appears to be a cover-up in an obvious attempt to protect his job. He lost. Soon afterward in April, the officer was fired bringing an abrupt end to a promising career as a Janesville police officer. End of story? Not quite.

It turns out that the former police officer, fired and disgraced by the Janesville department for the traffic incident, had 18 years of law enforcement experience including specialized training. In his quest to earn a living, James Martin applied with the Milton Police Department and was selected from a pool of 100 applicants. Finally, end of story? No - not yet!

Now in walks the Janesville Gazette. The compassionate newspaper prints a frontpage story titled,”Fired cop lands in Milton” and reminds the local readers of all the sordid details that led to Martin’s dismissal.
JG excerpt:
Martin was also accused……..accused of lying…….showing “contempt”………..accused Martin of drunken driving……….not fully cooperating………..showing disregard…….. etc.
Why would the Gazette print a story like this? To what end does it serve?

I’m not defending James Martin in his involvement with the accident or his attitude that followed. Of course law officers and public officials should be held to a higher standard. I don’t know what other fines or punishment were carried out in court if any after he lost his job, but I have to assume he paid his price and justice was served.

Apparently though that’s not good enough for the Gazette, so they throw a reporter on it to make sure the Milton Police Commission knows what kind of a hire they have in Martin.
JG excerpt:
”It was an easy call,” said Stephen Tupper, chairman of the commission. He continued, “We felt he was a very good candidate.” We’re glad to have him. He brings a lot to the table, including experience to train young officers.” As for Martin, he simply wants to put the past behind him.
One could only guess at the questions asked by the Gazette reporter to inspire those answers. Instead of letting the fallen man start over and carry on with his life, the Gazette gives Martin their style of justice, one more time.

Good luck, James Martin. I wish you the best in your new job!

11 comments:

Jimdaddy said...

It is news in the Janesville area. I don't fault the gazette for printing the story. It may be bigger news because he did land a job so close to Janesville.

Lou Kaye said...

It was news when word of the original investigation was publicized and like I said before I'm not defending what he did with the accident. BUT, if people think he wasn't punished enough they need to take it up with the Janesville Police Department, courts and legislators to create new laws. If he paid his dues, whatever they were, he deserves the same privacy as you and I. What the Gazette did to him with that article was nothing short of stalking.

Anonymous said...

I guess driving under the influence when your a police officer is acceptable.

Lou Kaye said...

I believe when people break the law and pay their dues to society whatever they are, they deserve the right to continue on with their lives afterwards, without being hounded by newspapers.

Don't be silly, drunken driving is a crime in my book, the police officer is lucky he didn't kill someone. I think Wisconsins drunk driving is a farce. Anybody can make a mistake, the second time is inexcusable.

Anonymous said...

I disagree when your a person who knows the law like a police officer you should be held to higher standards. I agree we all make mistakes but, this is a person who knows better. He arrests people all the time for driving under the influence. The law is the law. I have my CDL and if I get arrested for DWI I loose my license and my career for ever.

Lou Kaye said...

Back up a moment. Are you saying that Martin is driving or acting as a police officer illegally?

If he is, its not up to you, me or the newspapers to punish him. Like you said the law is the law. Did he pay his price? If you think he didn't, then you need to take it up with law enforcement officials, courts and even your state representative. Maybe they need news laws regarding this. If the Gazette had a problem with Martin being rehired, they should have questioned Mahan on his dismissal and searched open records for more information, then they could have written a positive article about the situation, instead of what they did.

Martin knows this is his last chance to get on the right track. If he screws up again, there will be no more chances again.

Anonymous said...

The law doesn't effect the employment of a person. He may have paid the price in society but, that isn't required in the workplace.

Lou Kaye said...

So you believe then, that a third party such as a newspaper is fully empowered to go beyond the law and act as an agent of punishment to ensure that people pay for their mistakes as long as they can?

Anonymous said...

The newspaper reports news. The mainstream media will tend to lean heavily to the left and put a negative spin on the right. But, I do believe that stories should be reported and we should be able to see what our own opinion is.

Lou Kaye said...

I don't follow your mainstream media comment. But the media could look into the private lives of all citizens and "create" a story somewhere. That does not mean it is the right thing to do.

Anonymous said...

A cop should know better than to drive drunk. What an idiot. This is a person who upholds the law and arrests people for driving drunk. It's a lame excuse to say he made a mistake. What if he would have killed someone or hurt somebody while he was hammered? He should be held to higher standards. I'm glad he isn't on Janesville's payroll. I'm glad I'm not paying for his wages anymore.

Post a Comment