Early Links - Emails Confirm Walker Tied To Illegal Campaign Activity

Tweet

Scott Walker supporters went on a tangent soon after the release of some 28,000 pages of emails from the first John Doe investigation. At the top of their talking points seems to be a veiled acceptance that Walker is indeed guilty of the allegations, but that the case is closed without charges against him and therefore he is protected by double jeopardy. Strange defense considering they want to run this guy for president.

Walker himself downplayed the importance of the email release calling them years old 'communications from a county employee.'

Below are some of the early links to the email scandal posted on #WIunion

The Progressive - Starting Today, Scott Walker is Officially in Hot Water

The Progressive - The Biggest Revelations from Scott Walker's Really Bad Day

Slate - This Could Be the Start of Scott Walker’s Bridgegate

The Nation - Emails, Charges, Probes! Chris Christie? No, Scott Walker

CapTimes - Records released in John Doe probe of Scott Walker aides — here's what to watch

CapTimes - How deep Will The Damage Be For Scott Walker From The John Doe Email Dump?

DailyKos - Big Wis. John Doe News - Thousands of Emails and Documents Released

Think Progress - Emails Suggest Walker Knew Of Illegal Campaign Coordination

AlterNet - Did Scott Walker Just Tank his Career?

JohnDoeWalker.Com - Dedicated Website For Tracking Walker-related Emails In Cover-Up Scandal

TPM - Investigation Surrounding Walker Even Bigger Than We Thought

TPM - Scott Walker Aide Forwarded A Totally Racist Email

Huff Post - Scott Walker Ordered Doctor Fired Because She Was Once A Thong Model

Blue Cheddar - Quick thoughts on the John Doe document release

The Political Environment - More On Email Showing Walker Wanted Cover-Up In County Patient Death

Washington Post - Scott Walker, eyeing 2016, faces fallout from probes as ex-aide’s e-mails are released

MKE Express - Rindfleisch to Campaign: You Guys Are in the Drivers Seat

JS Online - Unsealed email ties Scott Walker to secret email system

NOTE: Hours later, JS Online changed above title to "Emails link Scott Walker to secret email system."

Wisconsin State Journal - John Doe transcript: Scott Walker must have known of private email, laptop system

Video: Forum - Danger To Democracy With Mike McCabe

Tweet

Forum was held Wednesday, February 12th in Janesville.

Part 1 is Mike McCabe's introduction. He spends some time talking about the influence of money in government, how a few wealthy donors can neutralize the voices of the many and why it is important to follow the money in order to understand the backwards legislation that is sweeping through Wisconsin.

As can be expected, the news is not good as the majority is vastly outgunned and outspent by outside interests. Parts 2, 3 and 4 are mostly question and answer. This is important commentary. Watch it:

Part 1:



Part 2 (12 min.)

Part 3 (27 min.)

Part 4 (11 min.)

Big thanks to Vckstr89 for the video work and uploads.

Palin: Governors Know What Their Staffs Are Up To

Tweet

If you can stomach listening to Sarah Palin for about a minute, you might actually appreciate (forgive me) what she has to say in this video about her own experience as governor and how it taught her that politicians and executives know what their paid staff is up to. Our own scandal-ridden Gov. Scott Walker bookends her comment.

Janesville Forum: McCabe On Danger To Democracy

Tweet

Rock County Progressives present ...

Forum: ‘Danger to Democracy’

Speaker:
Mike McCabe of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign... wisdc.org

When:
Wednesday, February 12
6 PM-6:30 PM cheese & cracker reception (nonalcoholic potluck)
6:30 PM- 7:45 PM, speaker & discussion

Where:
**Basics Food Cooperative
1711 Lodge Dr.
Janesville, Wisconsin

(**This is an independent event not affiliated with Basics)

Directions: from Madison route 90 until 1st Janesville exit, south on Route 26 past route 14, look for Toys R Us on the right, right on Lodge Drive, on right across from Toys R Us.

Walker's Local Booster Club Ignores State "Surplus," Heads To DC For Transportation Dollars

Tweet

The Janesville Gazette posted a short question and answer info-commercial about members of Gov. Scott Walker's local red state booster club, Forward Janesville, plan to fly out to Washington DC to keep the federal cash cow spigot open for their politically connected road building support base.

You might recall that it was the ALEC-like Forward Janesville and their vice-president of operations, Dan Cunningham, who slammed Tom Barrett in election year editorials for suggesting that local taxpayers get back a greater share of the money we send to Madison to help pay for repair and replacement of deteriorating local roads. Unfortunately, Forward Janesville's position prevailed. Gov. Walker returned fewer dollars to local taxpayers for roads, eventually forcing Janesville to enact its first ever municipal wheel (vehicle) tax.

Thanks Forward Janesville. Thanks Gov. Walker.

But because Walker continues to return fewer and fewer dollars back to the locals, Janesville is not out of the woods yet on road maintenance. Two years ago, I predicted that the local wheel tax could soon run up to $80 a year from under the pressure of rising costs, inflation and a backlog of unfunded road repair. Sure enough last October, the Janesville city council suggested raising the one-year-old wheel tax to $48 to pay for road work. That proposal has been shelved, but is likely to come back during the next city budget.

Now however, Forward Janesville has strangely taken to Tom Barrett's "local" approach for transportation dollars.

JG Excerpt:
"We need to make sure that Wisconsin gets back on a dollar-for-dollar basis what it sends to Washington for transportation projects," Cunningham said.

The pecking order is rather obvious. Barrett asked the state to return tax dollars for local road maintenance and now the folks who opposed that say we need to make sure the state gets back dollar-for-dollar from Washington for the same.

Except, Forward Janesville asking the federal government for more money while it's still running deficits is very odd at a time Wisconsin is supposedly posting a "surplus." Why aren't they asking Walker to return some of that money for roads so we don't have to double tax ourselves?

It's even more amazing when so-called non-partisan city employees like Janesville's School Superintendent, Karen Schulte and Janesville's new city manager, Mark Freitag, will accompany the red state lobby group, whose legislative agenda and politics are largely responsible for busting local budgets, on the trip to DC.

Imagine if high ranking city employees were flying instead with the SEIU or Planned Parenthood for some education and health care dollars. The blistering rage would be endless.

Schulte and Freitag are definitely showing their true colors and raising their partisan credentials on this one. It is duly noted.

Comedian Bill Maher Wants To Flip A District. Will He Pick Paul Ryan?

Tweet

NY Times Excerpt:
Bill Maher makes little effort to hide his own contempt for many politicians, most of them Republicans. Now, he wants to take it to the next level: finding one he might be able to help oust from office.

On his weekly HBO talk show, “Real Time With Bill Maher,” on Friday night, Mr. Maher and his staff plan to ask viewers to make a case for their individual representatives in the House to be selected as the worst in the country.

From there, Maher intends to highlight the incumbent congressional on his show in an effort to change the hearts and minds of voters at home.

Of course the lawmaker has to be in a competitive race, but I would think most observers would say the gap continues to close in on Paul Ryan, particularly among the Tea Party base who were stung by his votes on the TARP and bail-outs and again betrayed by his recent positions on the fiscal cliff, amnesty and pension cuts for military veterans. Some Democrats and Liberals who once supported Ryan in his hometown of Janesville now see him as a Koch-bought career politician and a social drag.

There was some concern over whether Maher's little project was legal, but according to Politico, it was confirmed Maher's move is indeed legal -- as long as his efforts are not coordinated with the person he hopes wins. (He will also have to report some activity to the Federal Elections Commission.)

A popular Wisconsin political blog, Root River Siren, posted an article encouraging readers to convince Bill Maher To Flip Paul Ryan and included a dedicated Web page outlining votes, quotes, photos and videos of the damage Paul Ryan had done in Congress during his career. I of course totally agree that Congressman Ryan is the worst and asked Maher to select him for the flip.

This is one of those times to get on social media, preferably the recommended Twitter hashtag #flipadistrict, and start tweeting and retweeting your choice for the flip. There's plenty of competition so Maher needs to hear from you right now.

Simple Math Debunks Walker's Incredible "Grassroots" Campaign

Tweet

First off, campaign finance reports are all about the cash, so when Gov. Walker's campaign operatives recently claimed that 75% of the reported $5.1M came from donations of $50 or less demonstrates "incredible grassroots support," some of us knew they were trying to pull one of the oldest and lamest tricks in the book.

Journal Times Excerpt:
Walker's campaign manager, Stephan Thompson, said in a statement that 75 percent of Walker's donations came from people giving $50 or less.

"It's the incredible support from the grassroots that will enable Governor Walker to continue moving Wisconsin forward," Thompson said.

Wow! Really? That is incredible ...LOL, but I found that those donating $50 or less comprise less than 20 percent of Walker's total campaign cash. So while they're counting apples, I'm counting cash.

Unfortunately, I don't have a staff to pour through Walker's campaign finance report to count each donor and the amount they gave to prove my point, so what I use is the old averaging concept. It works like this:

Walker's campaign report consists of 2,180 pages listing individual donations. The vast majority of pages have 17 - 18 entries of single donations, but there are also a substantial number of pages with 12 or 13 donors. So I applied an average of 15 entries per page. Most of the single donations of $50 or less are either for $50 or $20 with variations in between and some at $10 and less. With that I chose $35 as the average amount donated by the pool categorized at $50 or less.

I'm also assuming that the 75% figure from Walker's campaign is correct.

So let's roll the tape:

2,180 pages X 15 entries per page = 32,700 donations

75% of 32,700 donations = 24,525 X $35 donation = $858,375

$858,375 is 16.77 percent of $5,119,176 total donations

Obviously, the 16.8% is an approximate figure so I would not doubt it could be off by one or two points either way, but I think you'll agree it's a very reasonable estimate.

Don't get me wrong, $858,375 is a substantial amount of $50 or less donations, but when it makes up less than 20% of the total campaign cash, painting it as a "grassroots" majority campaign is nothing more than cheap spin to deliberately misinform the public.

Using their campaign's own definition for "grassroots" as donations of $50 or less leaves us to conclude that up to 83 percent of Walker's campaign cash comes from deep pocketed out-of-state special interests much like the Texas fundraiser at a billionaire's mansion where Walker is scheduled to appear.

I don't think there is any statement, report or action taken that is not first measured, adjusted and reframed for its highest political value by Gov. Walker and his staff, no matter how lame it is constructed.

Grassroots campaign? Don't make me laugh.

ADDITIONAL:

CapTimes - Scott Walker's Big Money Comes From Big Donors Outside Wisconsin

The New Normal For Wisconsin? The People Are Not On The Agenda.

Tweet

I've been staying out of a story about a wealthy Rock County landowner looking to fast-track a development including a new I-90 interchange near Milton primarily because there appears to be a group of concerned local residents organizing on the issue and regardless of their political stripes, I would not want to effect their position in any adverse way or otherwise.

But here's a few pieces of advice on the subject for whatever it's worth:

#1. The land owner including the Janesville Gazette articles never mention TIF District financing, the slush fund economic development tool that will no doubt be used to finance much of the landowner's infrastructure once the land is annexed. What's important is that the landowner's 1,500 acres earmarked for development (7 times the size of the sprawling GM compound in Janesville) is mostly farmland with features of limestone hardscaping and it is this kind of vacant land that carries a minimal value for tax assessment purposes and gets locked in as the baseline value upon creation of a TIF agreement.

This means that although the parcels with new construction pay the regular rate of assessed value in property taxes as they incrementally improve, local governments and school districts receive only a few dollars an acre as before when the land was undeveloped. This in turn means that property owners in the local townships and cities outside the TIF pay the developers share of taxes for police, fire and other service costs covering the development. This can go on for 15 to 25 years or so depending on the term of the agreement.

#2. At least the Gazette appears to be doing some rare fair reporting on the fast-tracking aspect of the developer's proposal. In this article, (pay site) the newspaper writes well about the disregard of public input and lack of public hearings while local officials and township boards are forging ahead with preliminary road, zoning and legal agreements behind closed doors. If true, open records requests might have to be filed in order to find out exactly what's going on. Sadly, it might be time for the opposition group to get an attorney.

#3. It's easy to blame, target or get angry with the developer even if he has ulterior motives, but I would suggest not to. He's just doing exactly what is expected from a landowner/developer. It's the mayors, councils and township boards who are, at least up to this point in time, appearing to betray the public trust. This may sound overly basic, but they're supposed to work for the will of their constituency, not work to leverage a developer against them. He works for himself.

#4 If local government boards pre-determine a decision in favor the developer, it will be nearly impossible to stop. You'll hear, "we've gone this far and spent this much time and money, why turn back now," over and over again.

#5 Of additional concern should be the developer's campaign to petition directly for annexation - which does not require noticing. This should tell all concerned individuals in opposition that your voices must not merely be public opinions - but just as equal - a campaign.

#6 Read this insightful article about the development game from 7 years ago written by Peter Mckeever, a Madison attorney. It's still very relevant today.